Testing the Gigabyte MA10-ST0 with pfSense 2.4-Release and FreeNAS 11.0-U4

Gigabyte MA10 ST0 Top
Gigabyte MA10 ST0 Top

Perhaps one of the most hotly anticipated embedded server motherboards is the Gigabyte MA10-ST0. It is a mITX motherboard with the highest-end QAT enabled Intel Atom C3958. That chip has 16 of the newest generation Intel Atom C3000 cores codenamed “Denverton”. The Gigabyte MA10-ST0 has a few features that make it ideal for a storage or network appliance. First, it has 2x SFP+ LAN ports in addition to 2x 1GbE ports for plenty of networking along with CPU power. Second, it has a massive array of 16 SATA III ports. Finally, it has a 16-core CPU with excellent performance that we already covered in our Intel Atom C3958 Linux Benchmarks and Review.

Why Compatibility Testing is Important

Whenever a new generation of server hardware comes out, there is a lag before the OSes support the new hardware. This is normal. FreeBSD is a popular OS for embedded networking appliances as well as storage appliances. There are many commercial offerings that build upon FreeBSD based on the licensing. Along with these commercial offerings, FreeNAS and pfSense are popular storage and networking offerings based on FreeBSD so we wanted to try them out with the new hardware. The onboard eMMC storage of the Gigabyte MA10-ST0 is intended for embedded OS installs like both pfSense and FreeNAS use.

Gigabyte MA10-ST0 with pfSense 2.4-Release

The brand new pfSense 2.4-Release just came out a few days ago. We tested this on the Gigabyte MA10-ST0 and saw a long list of controller timeouts and register dumps fly across the console:

Gigabyte MA10 ST0 PfSense 2.4 Release
Gigabyte MA10 ST0 PfSense 2.4 Release

This is not uncommon on new platforms. Reporting errors on STH is not overly useful to the open source community. We reached out to the pfSense team and offered to set this system up in our DemoEval lab for them to use for a possible 2.4.3 inclusion. Our sense is that in one of the upcoming dot releases we will see support for the Intel Atom C3000 series, including NICs.

Gigabyte MA10-ST0 with FreeNAS 11.0-U4

We tried FreeNAS 11.0-U4 with the Gigabyte MA10-ST0 and had a better result, yet with some quirks. First off, during the installation process, the OS installed, however, we were not presented with the onboard eMMC option. Instead, all you can see is the lone Intel DC S3520 1.2TB SSD we had installed:

Gigabyte MA10 ST0 FreeNAS 11 U4 Install
Gigabyte MA10 ST0 FreeNAS 11 U4 Install

The install otherwise worked fine with one caveat as we expected: networking.

Gigabyte MA10 ST0 FreeNAS 11 U4
Gigabyte MA10 ST0 FreeNAS 11 U4

The Gigabyte MA10-ST0 has two SFP+ 10GbE ports from the C3958 onboard, but also has two Intel i210-at 1GbE NICs. After we finished the initial installation, the two onboard 1GbE NICs were functional, however, the two 10GbE NICs did not yet have an out-of-box supported driver. We expect this will be remedied soon as FreeBSD updates their Intel driver and FreeNAS supports this.

Linux Support

If you are using a newer Debian, CentOS 7.4, or Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS (with HWE kernel) you are going to be fine. We have even build QuickAssist acceleration with ZFS 0.7.2 for gzip compression on the CentOS 7.4 distribution. In fact, CentOS would even allow us to install to the 32GB eMMC NIC:

Gigabyte MA10 ST0 CentOS Install
Gigabyte MA10 ST0 CentOS Install

Here is the Quick Assist Technology (QAT) accelerator with driver installed:

Intel Atom C3xxx QAT Device
Intel Atom C3xxx QAT Device

Here is a quick look at one of our baseline runs running ZFS on Linux writing to a 2x 960GB SSD striped ZFS gzip compressed pool using fio:

Intel Atom C3958 Htop Gzip 1
Intel Atom C3958 Htop Gzip 1

As you can see, without QAT acceleration that the fio write threads use very little CPU but ZFS is taking advantage of the 16 threads to compress data and write it to disk.

We are going to have QAT offload ZFS on Linux gzip compression results in the near future. Suffice to say, if you are working with the Intel Atom C3000 series, newer Linux kernels have a lot of support, and FreeBSD is almost there. We do not expect many Intel Atom C3000 series SoC’s to be used with Windows but we can confirm it works provided you install to a larger SSD and use the latest Intel Windows networking drivers for 10GbE.

On the Debian side, we showed that the Proxmox VE hyper-converged platform works out of the box with the Intel Atom C3000 series:

Final Words

We spend a lot of time trying hardware in a number of OSes and use our DemoEval lab to give back to the open source community that makes software our readers use every day. We are certainly getting close to the point where the Intel Atom C3000 series is going to be well supported for FreeBSD and that is important. In the embedded device market where the Gigabyte MA10-ST0 and other Intel Atom C3000 series systems are intended to be used FreeBSD and Linux are the two dominant OSes. We hope our readers have a better understanding regarding where support is as of mid-October 2017 and we expect this support to expand and improve in the next few weeks and months.


  1. So making a hardware available is considered contributing now? I think you need to write code to have it count not just let devs on so they can code.

  2. @Tim Hartfield
    What good is it if the devs have nothing to verify on? There are many ways to contribute, writing codes isn’t the only way.

  3. As a FreeBSD developer, I can tell you that making hardware available definitely counts as contributing.

  4. @Tim Hartfield even simple compatibility testing like this is really useful. We’d all like to see more but until someone tries it, developers might not know. When I’m putting on my dev consumer hat knowing there’s a platform that might be good with a slight amount of work is useful too.

  5. Making the hardware available removes the cost barrier for a developer and the knowledge/time spent acquiring and setting up the server, the result is time savings for the developer.

  6. I’m seeing all these articles like this one and feel like it’s a bit of a tease sometimes… these C3000 boards can’t be bought in stores, so all I can do is dream about them when I put my head down to sleep.

    Can I get pricing of C2000 series and C3000 series? I need to buy a C2000 I think.

  7. STH, please write a secondary article about the C3000 series boards when FreeNAS and pFsense are fully supported.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.