HPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10 Review

11

HPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10 Benchmarks

For this exercise, we are using our legacy Linux-Bench scripts which help us see cross-platform “least common denominator” results we have been using for years as well as several results from our updated Linux-Bench2 scripts. At this point, our benchmarking sessions take days to run and we are generating well over a thousand data points. We are also running workloads for software companies that want to see how their software works on the latest hardware. As a result, this is a small sample of the data we are collecting and can share publicly. Our position is always that we are happy to provide some free data but we also have services to let companies run their own workloads in our lab, such as with our DemoEval service. What we do provide is an extremely controlled environment where we know every step is exactly the same and each run is done in a real-world data center, not a test bench.

We are going to show off a few results, and highlight a number of interesting data points in this article.

Python Linux 4.4.2 Kernel Compile Benchmark

This is one of the most requested benchmarks for STH over the past few years. The task was simple, we have a standard configuration file, the Linux 4.4.2 kernel from kernel.org, and make the standard auto-generated configuration utilizing every thread in the system. We are expressing results in terms of compiles per hour to make the results easier to read:

AMD Opteron X3421 Linux Kernel Compile Benchmark
AMD Opteron X3421 Linux Kernel Compile Benchmark

Here we can see the performance of the HPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10 above a quad-core Intel Atom C3558. The Intel Atom C3558 is part of the Intel “Denverton” series of CPUs and does not include an integrated GPU.

c-ray 1.1 Performance

We have been using c-ray for our performance testing for years now. It is a ray tracing benchmark that is extremely popular to show differences in processors under multi-threaded workloads. We are going to use our 4K results which work well at this end of the performance spectrum.

AMD Opteron X3421 C Ray 4K Benchmark
AMD Opteron X3421 C Ray 4K Benchmark

Built on the AMD Excavator core, the AMD Opteron X3421 is not the c-ray (or Cinebench) monster one would expect from AMD’s newer Zen cores. Instead, it is an older 28nm core which performs well, but it is still a long way to the higher-end cores.

Since we are still within the Intel Atom C2758 product lifecycle, we wanted to note four X3421 cores beat eight C2000 cores here. We did not have the AMD Opteron X3216 or X3218 versions of the MicroServer Gen10 to test, however one would expect lower performance from dual core parts.

7-zip Compression Performance

7-zip is a widely used compression/ decompression program that works cross-platform. We started using the program during our early days with Windows testing. It is now part of Linux-Bench.

AMD Opteron X3421 7zip Compression Benchmark
AMD Opteron X3421 7zip Compression Benchmark

This is one of the more interesting results we had. Here, the AMD Opteron X3421 performed slightly better than the Intel Xeon D-1518 which is an impressive result. Since the AMD Opteron X3421 is a different kind of part, it has characteristics that are unlike Intel CPUs.

NAMD Performance

NAMD is a molecular modeling benchmark developed by the Theoretical and Computational Biophysics Group in the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. More information on the benchmark can be found here. Here are the comparison results for the legacy data set:

AMD Opteron X3421 NAMD Benchmark
AMD Opteron X3421 NAMD Benchmark

Again, we see the AMD Opteron X3421 slightly passing the lower core count Broadwell-DE chips. It is worth noting that the AMD Opteron X3421 has a configurable TDP up to 35W. The chips that are performing much better here also have a higher TDP. The Intel Core i3-8100 has an iGPU, higher clock speeds, but also a 65W TDP.

Sysbench CPU test

Sysbench is another one of those widely used Linux benchmarks. We specifically are using the CPU test, not the OLTP test that we use for some storage testing.

AMD Opteron X3421 Sysbench CPU Benchmark
AMD Opteron X3421 Sysbench CPU Benchmark

Here the quad-core CPU with slightly higher clock speeds is able to out-pace the Intel Xeon Bronze 3104. That is a fantastic result as the Xeon Bronze 3104 chip itself is almost the price of a discounted HPE ProLiant Microserver Gen10 with AMD Opteron X3421.

OpenSSL Performance

OpenSSL is widely used to secure communications between servers. This is an important protocol in many server stacks. We first look at our sign tests:

AMD Opteron X3421 OpenSSL Sign Benchmark
AMD Opteron X3421 OpenSSL Sign Benchmark

Here are the verify results:

AMD Opteron X3421 OpenSSL Verify Benchmark
AMD Opteron X3421 OpenSSL Verify Benchmark

OpenSSL is a foundational web technology these days, making these results important. Again we can see the AMD Opteron X3421 place just a bit higher than the Intel Atom C3000 series with competitive core counts and above the Intel Xeon D-1500 series here.

UnixBench Dhrystone 2 and Whetstone Benchmarks

Some of the longest-running tests at STH are the venerable UnixBench 5.1.3 Dhrystone 2 and Whetstone results. They are certainly aging, however, we constantly get requests for them, and many angry notes when we leave them out. UnixBench is widely used so we are including it in this data set. Here are the Dhrystone 2 results:

AMD Opteron X3421 UnixBench Dhrystone 2 Benchmark
AMD Opteron X3421 UnixBench Dhrystone 2 Benchmark

Here are the whetstone results:

AMD Opteron X3421 UnixBench Whetstone Benchmark
AMD Opteron X3421 UnixBench Whetstone Benchmark

If you are looking for single-threaded performance, chips like the Intel Core i3-8100 are going to have more performance. For the lower-power embedded space, one can see higher per-core performance which aligns with how the AMD Opteron X3421 is seeing more performance on a core-for-core basis than some of its low power Intel competition.

Chess Benchmarking

Chess is an interesting use case since it has almost unlimited complexity. Over the years, we have received a number of requests to bring back chess benchmarking. We have been profiling systems and are ready to start sharing results:

AMD Opteron X3421 Chess Benchmark
AMD Opteron X3421 Chess Benchmark

On the chess benchmark side, we again see the chip perform better than the Intel Atom C3000 series at the same core count, but not to where we would expect an Intel Core i3, Xeon E3, or Xeon E-2100 series.

Overall, the CPU performance is good for the low-end embedded space. Since we benchmarked this system, we also benchmarked a newer embedded part, the Intel Pentium Silver J5005 which is newer, but shows how technology is moving forward.

Next, we are going to look at the HPE ProLiant MicroServe Gen10 power consumption and noise before concluding with our final thoughts.

1
2
3
4
5
REVIEW OVERVIEW
Design & Aesthetics
8.9
Performance
8.9
Feature Set
8.8
Value
9.5
SHARE
Previous articleNew HPE SGI 8600 14PF Jean Zay Platform Announced
Next articleIntel Xeon E-2174G Benchmarks and Review
Patrick has been running STH since 2009 and covers a wide variety of SME, SMB, and SOHO IT topics. Patrick is a consultant in the technology industry and has worked with numerous large hardware and storage vendors in the Silicon Valley. The goal of STH is simply to help users find some information about server, storage and networking, building blocks. If you have any helpful information please feel free to post on the forums.

11 COMMENTS

  1. That conclusion is really insightful. If you want multiple low cost servers with hard drives for clustered storage, this is a really good platform. If you just want more power, I keep buying up into the ML110 G10 because that’s so much more powerful. It’s also larger so sometimes you can’t afford the space.

  2. Finally, an honest review that actually shows cons as well was what’s good.

    We use MSG10s at our branch offices. They’re great, but servicing them sucks. We’ve been training finance people to do the physical service on the MSG10s.

    One issue you didn’t bring up is that there’s a lock for the front to secure all the drives. We had one where it wasn’t locked, employee flipped the lock and ended breaking the bezel.

    I hope you guys do more ProLiant reviews. They need a site with technical depth and business sense reviewing their products not just getting lame 5 paragraph “it’s great” reviews.

    To anyone not using the MSG10, they do have downsides, but they’re cheap so you have to expect that it isn’t a Rolls Royce at a KIA price tag

  3. It’s too bad this doesn’t have dual x8 PCIe. It also needs 10G. This is 2019. To get 10G or 25G you’ve gotta burn the x8 which leaves you with only a x1 slot left. Can’t do much with that.

  4. What about the virtualization capabilities? In your article on the APU, your lscpu output reported AMD-V. It would be nice to know if it’s fully implemented in BIOS and if there are reasonable IOMMU groups. Also, Intel consumer/entry level processors lack Access Control Services support on the processors PCIe root ports, so would be nice to see what this AMD APU offers.

    Why do I care? Because it would be nice to have a dedicated VM running less trusted graphical applications for digital signage. In a home office use case, one could use virtualization to combine a Linux NAS and a Kodi HTPC on the same hardware. Exposing the Kodi VM instead of the server OS to your family might have advantages.

  5. Like the others small HPE ProLiant MicroServers in the past, an attractive looking little box. I wish it were possible to install an externally accessible SFF x8 mobile rack such as a Supermicro CSE-M28SAB and the motherboard had x2 SFF 8087 ports or better M28SACB and 8643, thus could have x2 RAID 10 volumes.

  6. Well, I suppose you could put a ZOTAC GT 710 1GB graphics card in the spare slot, as it is a purpose-built PCIe x1 card. Marginally better than the iGPU if you have the need, and handy to keep around if your onboard graphics quits working on a server and a small x1 slot is all you have left to work with.

  7. It is a very good system, I got two with the dual core APU and 16G memory. It is possible to use the PCIe slt for an SSD card as well, I have an intel i750 that fits inside and works fine. I reckon that a couple of modifications to a future design could really make it quite good.

    Running latest version of Solaris on this works a treat hosting files over NFS.

  8. The price of these just doesn’t justify the performance. I have an older model I was able to pick up for a great price (NEW) and works great for very small stuffs, but choked when I attempted a large ZFS Freenas setup.

  9. Under Test Configuration, you have 4x10Tb HDD’s and a 400GB SSD. I thought that that this machine could only handle a maximum of 16TB overall, is this not true?

  10. Does anybody know, if the harddisks can be used in JBOD mode? I intend to run a Linux-based software RAID-5, because i do not want to rely on the controller hardware and RAID-5 isn’t supported anyway. Power outage is no concern to me as i am using an UPS. Thanks for any experience shared.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here