NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation Top-End Workstation GPU Review

4

SPECviewperf 2020

SPECviewperf 2020 measures the 3D graphics performance of systems running under the OpenGL and Direct X application programming interfaces.

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada SPECviewperf2020 Screen
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada SPECviewperf2020 Screen
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada SPECviewperf2020 3dsmax 07
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada SPECviewperf2020 3dsmax 07
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada SPECviewperf2020 Catia 06
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada SPECviewperf2020 Catia 06
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada SPECviewperf2020 Creo 03
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada SPECviewperf2020 Creo 03
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada SPECviewperf2020 Energy 03
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada SPECviewperf2020 Energy 03
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada SPECviewperf2020 Maya 06
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada SPECviewperf2020 Maya 06
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada SPECviewperf2020 Medical 03
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada SPECviewperf2020 Medical 03
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada SPECviewperf2020 Snx 04
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada SPECviewperf2020 Snx 04
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada SPECviewperf2020 Solidworks 07
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada SPECviewperf2020 Solidworks 07

With SPECviewperf2020 we see that having the 48GBs of RAM really allows the RTX 6000 Ada to dominate the scores with applications it was designed to handle. One single card grabs double the results of a single GeForce RTX 4090.

Something else that is notable is that we got a higher geomean on our results than AMD used for the NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada when launching its recent AMD Radeon Pro W7900 and W7800 GPUs.

Let us move on and start our new tests with rendering-related benchmarks.

4 COMMENTS

  1. nice review, was wondering why the RTX A6000 wasn’t taken into the comparisons, the “original” RTX A6000 is a generation before that, the A6000 is one generation old

  2. edit: the “original” RTX 6000 (minus the A), and i ment it is 2 generations old,
    sorry for the typo

  3. Did you use Nvidia’s “Studio Driver” for the 4090 tests? That driver has optimizations for some professional applications. I’m particularly interested to see if the 4090 gets a performance increase for the specviewperf tests.

  4. junk in price/performance terms. But we don’t have other choice if we want to use +24GB memory over the 3090/4090 memory (for 3x the price – wow sooo expensive extra 24G GDDR-6). The premium price is clearly usage of the monopoly situation of Nvidia.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.