Quanta QCT QoolRack Liquid Cooling Intel Xeon Max Overview

1

Intel Xeon Platinum 8458P to Intel Xeon Max 9468 Performance

Here, we will use the Intel Xeon Max with its 64GB of onboard HBM2e memory and vary our SNC. We have DDR5 in the Xeon Platinum. The maximum core count for both parts is 48 for the Xeon Max 9468 and 44 cores for the Xeon Platinum 8458P. Things are always a bit odd comparing the HBM parts since the 350W from the Xeon Max includes the HBM2e memory, but the DDR5 for the Xeon Platinum is not included in the 350W so the Xeon Platinum runs at higher clock speeds. Still, it was hard to get matching parts at the same core counts and clock speeds due to the power being used by the HBM2e memory on Xeon Max.

For NAMD, the Xeon Max was, as we would expect, faster with SNC=4.

Intel Xeon Max 9468 To Platinum 8458P Performance NAMD
Intel Xeon Max 9468 To Platinum 8458P Performance NAMD

Our OpenFOAM testing saw a similar trend.

Intel Xeon Max 9468 To Platinum 8458P Performance OpenFoam DrivAer Fastback 3M
Intel Xeon Max 9468 To Platinum 8458P Performance OpenFoam DrivAer Fastback 3M

These are really showing the benefit to the Xeon Max’s HBM2e memory.

Intel Xeon Max 9468 To Platinum 8458P Performance OpenFoam DrivAer Fastback 22.5M
Intel Xeon Max 9468 To Platinum 8458P Performance OpenFoam DrivAer Fastback 22.5M

On the materials modeling side, we see similar results again.

Intel Xeon Max 9468 To Platinum 8458P Performance VASP Si256
Intel Xeon Max 9468 To Platinum 8458P Performance VASP Si256

We did find one case where the SNC=4 was not advantageous, though.

Intel Xeon Max 9468 To Platinum 8458P Performance VASP CUC
Intel Xeon Max 9468 To Platinum 8458P Performance VASP CUC

Of course, if you want to learn more about Xeon Max, check out our in-depth piece. We are looking at HPC here, but there are other workloads that matter to folks. The QoolRack is seeing its first customers in the HPC space, so that is why we used the Xeon Max.

The real question is the power consumption impact.

QCT QoolRack Power Consumption Impact

We started with a rack with a bunch of air-cooled systems, and we were getting just shy of 12kW of total power consumption, of which the rack was using around a quarter of that for cooling.

QCT Air Cooled Xeon Comparison
QCT Air Cooled Xeon Comparison from QCT Monitoring

Pulling the data off the QoolRack, the remaining fans were running at a lower load and the rear door heat exchanger fans were not even running at their highest speeds because the solution is designed for much higher power consumption in a rack.

QCT QoolRack Intel Xeon Max Total Power
QCT QoolRack Intel Xeon Max Total Power from QCT Monitoring

Here we can see around 10% power savings. That is good, but the other side is that the CDU and rear door heat exchanger had more capacity for cooling, so one can allegedly do better with larger configurations. That is why we tend to see liquid cooling in dense clusters.

Final Words

Liquid cooling is a big deal. With the surge of AI in the market and the next generation of new higher-power chips, 2024 will see rapid adoption of liquid cooling for high-end computing. For now, we wanted to show off what QCT is doing on the liquid cooling side since they are a larger vendor of cloud and AI systems.

QCT QoolRack QuantaGrid D54X 1U Liquid Cooled Out Of Rack Angle 1
QCT QoolRack QuantaGrid D54X 1U Liquid Cooled Out Of Rack Angle 1

Hopefully, this was a fun look at the QCT QoolRack solution for folks as we head into SC23 season.

1 COMMENT

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.